When the judge asks “who’s here?” it’s best to answer promptly

Ouch [pdf file].

This order illustrates one of the dangers of that double-edge sword known as the telephonic hearing. Appearing by telephone is convenient and can save clients significant amounts of money. But because it is easy to tune the telephone conversation out for even just  a moment and not hear something—when your email alert displays the new message you just received, for example—bad things can happen.

In this case, the sanctioned attorney did a commendable job in doing what the court ordered. Still, one can’t help but wince a bit and be grateful that it happened to someone else.

[Hat tip to the always-excellent Indiana Law Blog.]

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s